A Machine That Continues Text
A large language model (LLM) is a program trained on huge amounts of text. During this training, it learned which sequences of words are likely in which context. When you ask it a question, it does not “look up” the answer in an encyclopedia: it produces, piece by piece, the most plausible continuation of text given your request.
This mechanism explains both its strengths and its weaknesses:
- it writes fluent English, adapts its tone, and summarizes, rephrases, and structures very well;
- but it has no built-in notion of truth: a false sentence can seem just as plausible to it as a true one.
The assistants you use at work (company chat, an assistant built into your email or word processor) rely on this type of model, sometimes complemented by tools: web search, reading your documents, a calculator.
What It Can Do
Generative AI is an excellent first-draft assistant:
- Write: a draft email, an announcement, a briefing note, an outline for a presentation.
- Rephrase: simplify a technical text, change the tone, translate.
- Summarize: condense meeting minutes or a long document that you give it.
- Structure: turn notes into an outline, a table, an action list.
- Suggest ideas: headlines, interview questions, possible customer objections.
In all these cases, you stay in control: you review, correct, and decide.
What It Cannot Do (or Does Poorly)
- Recent facts: its knowledge stops at the cutoff date of its training data. Without access to a search or to your documents, it does not know what has happened since, and may not say so.
- Precise facts: figures, dates, references to legal texts, names of people. It can make them up very convincingly: this is called hallucination.
- Calculations: without a calculation tool, it can get a simple column sum wrong.
- Your context: it knows neither your customers, nor your internal procedures, nor your figures, unless you give them to it (with the precautions covered later in this course).
- Consistency: the same question asked twice can produce two different answers.
The Right Reflex: AI Proposes, You Decide
One simple rule guides this whole course: responsibility for the result stays with the person who uses it. If an email sent to a customer contains an error produced by AI, it is your email. In practice:
- Use AI to go faster on form (writing, structure, tone).
- Check the substance yourself (facts, figures, commitments).
- Do not entrust it with a decision that affects a person (hiring, disciplinary action, credit) without real human oversight.
Choosing the Right Task
Before opening the assistant, ask yourself two questions:
- Can I easily check the result? A summary of a document I have in front of me: yes. A market statistic with no source: no.
- What does an error cost? A poor headline idea: low. A wrong figure in a quote: high.
The easier the verification and the lower the cost of an error, the better a choice AI is.
Exercises
Solutions and tests stay on the server. In the student space, your code is run and checked, and the tutor gives hints before the solution.
Sort tasks by how suitable they are for AI
Here are six requests that colleagues are considering handing to a generative AI assistant:
No. Request 1 Rephrase a customer follow-up email that is too curt 2 Give the VAT rate that applies to a specific product, with no source 3 Summarize a 3-page meeting report provided to the assistant 4 Decide alone which candidate to hire for a position 5 Suggest 10 headline ideas for a newsletter 6 Calculate the total of a column of 200 amounts pasted into the chat, with no calculation tool Place each request in one of three categories: A = suitable, B = possible with mandatory verification against a reliable source or tool, C = not to be entrusted to AI. Write one sentence of justification for each.
- Each request is given a single category: A, B, or C
- Each classification is justified by ease of verification or the cost of an error
- Request 4 is classed C because it concerns a decision about a person
Where does the answer come from?
When an LLM answers a question with no search tool and no document provided, what does it rely on?
- A database of verified facts updated every day
- What it learned during training, by producing the most probable continuation of text
- A systematic automatic Internet search
- Your company's internal documents
Spotting a hallucination
An assistant cites an official report with a title, a date, and a link, but the link leads nowhere. What should you conclude?
- The site is surely down, the reference is reliable
- The reference may have been made up: you need to look it up in a reliable source before using it
- You just need to ask the assistant whether it is sure
- References produced by an AI are always accurate
End-of-lesson quiz
What does a “hallucination” of a language model refer to?
- A service outage
- A false statement presented convincingly
- A refusal to answer
Why might an assistant be unaware of a recent event?
- Because its knowledge stops at the end of its training data
- Because it refuses to cover the news
- Because it is limited to 100 words
Who is responsible for an email sent with text written by AI?
- The tool's publisher
- The person who sends it
- Nobody
The rest of the course
- Writing Good Prompts20 min
- Checking, Citing, and Avoiding Hallucinations15 min
- Confidential Data and GDPR15 min
- Business Cases: Writing, Summarizing, Analysis20 min